Title
Banner

Login Register

16

Dec

2009

Latest Region C Review Excludes Medical Necessity, Focuses on MS-DRGs PDF Print E-mail
Written by Carol Spencer, BA, RHIA, CCS, CHDA   
Article Index
Latest Region C Review Excludes Medical Necessity, Focuses on MS-DRGs
page 2
page 3
All Pages

carolSpencer

Recently, Connolly, Inc., the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) for Region C, announced the 24 MS-DRGs listed below as "approved issues." Connolly has now scheduled these MS-DRGs for DRG validation and discharge disposition review.*

 

At this time, medical necessity is excluded from the review.

 

2008 Medicare Data Reported

 

MS-DRG Identifiers

MS-DRG Numbers

Relative Weights

Transfer DRG(s)?

Major Chest Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without MCC/CC

163

164

165

4.9978

2.5953

1.8036

Yes

Other Respiratory System Operating Room (OR) Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without MCC/CC

166

167

168

3.6912

2.0264

1.3433

Yes

Respiratory System Diagnosis with Ventilator Support 96+ Hours

207

5.1055

Yes

Upper Limb and Toe Amputation for Circulatory System Disorders with MCC

255

2.4110

Yes

Major Small and Large Bowel Procedures with MCC, with CC, without CC/MCC

329

330

331

5.1666

2.5589

1.6224

Yes

Major Gastrointestinal Disorders and Peritoneal Infections without CC/MCC

372

1.3072

Yes

Inflammatory Bowel Disease with CC

386

1.0616

No

Other Digestive System Diagnoses with CC

394

0.9519

No

Cirrhosis and Alcoholic Hepatitis with MCC

432

1.679

No

Coagulation Disorders

813

1.3532

No

Septicemia Without Mechanical Ventilation 96+ Hours with MCC, without MCC

  • Extensive OR Procedure Unrelated to Principal Diagnosis with MCC, with CC, without MCC/CC

871

872

981

982

983

 

 

 

1.8222

1.1209

5.0238

3.0783

1.9948

Yes

  • Non-extensive OR Procedure Unrelated to Principal Diagnosis with MCC, with CC, without MCC/CC

987

988

989

3.4406

1.8792

1.1009

Yes

 

Steps to Take to Prepare

The four steps described below will help you prepare for the upcoming RAC focus.

 

1.   Run look-back data from October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2009 for the above MS-DRGs. Perform a probe review (25 cases) beginning with your highest volume and highest revenue MS-DRGs. Most likely, these will be the sepsis DRGs and the major small and large bowel procedure DRGs. Although lower volumes, the extensive and non-extensive operating room (OR) procedures unrelated to principal diagnosis may result in high dollar recoupment because of the high RWs of these MS-DRGs. This is the same for the major chest and the respiratory system OR procedure MS-DRGs.

 

2.   Quantify your improper payment by underpayment dollars and overpayment dollars and adding together to report a paid claims error rate (PCER) (total improper payment dollars divided by the total net dollars paid to the hospital by Medicare), which you can pull from the remittance advice. Benchmark your PCER to the PCER reported on the last Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) report (November 2008).

 

If your PCER is significantly higher than the one reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), ask yourself why that is the case. If it is significantly under CMS, then ask the same question. Is the audit methodology consistent with CMS? Is there a reason for your hospital to have a higher or lower PCER?

 

Drill into the root cause-including people, process and technology-to understand gaps, inconsistencies, and missing education, policies/procedures, and technology that can be implemented to mitigate future risk.

 

3.   Prioritize MS-DRGs with the highest improper payment risk and determine next steps. Is a second probe sample required? (If so, double the amount of the first probe sample.) Determine cases that need re-payment. Track all account numbers that are re-paid to the Medicare fiscal intermediary (FI) or administrative contractor (MAC) to be able to easily identify these cases to the RAC if it requests that in a future demand letter. Determine if the coding error was isolated or systemic. If isolated, provide education, correct process issues, implement additional controls and safeguards. If systemic, consult your compliance officer and legal.

 

4.   Track and trend results and report to your hospital board to keep them abreast and involved in all issues and repayments identified as a result of pre-emptive RAC audits.



 

Connect with RACmonitor

Your are currently browsing this site with Internet Explorer 6 (IE6).

Your current web browser must be updated to version 7 of Internet Explorer (IE7) to take advantage of all of template's capabilities.

Why should I upgrade to Internet Explorer 7? Microsoft has redesigned Internet Explorer from the ground up, with better security, new capabilities, and a whole new interface. Many changes resulted from the feedback of millions of users who tested prerelease versions of the new browser. The most compelling reason to upgrade is the improved security. The Internet of today is not the Internet of five years ago. There are dangers that simply didn't exist back in 2001, when Internet Explorer 6 was released to the world. Internet Explorer 7 makes surfing the web fundamentally safer by offering greater protection against viruses, spyware, and other online risks.

Get free downloads for Internet Explorer 7, including recommended updates as they become available. To download Internet Explorer 7 in the language of your choice, please visit the Internet Explorer 7 worldwide page.