Title
Banner

Login Register

28

Nov

2011

OIG Semiannual Report Notes Potential Overpayments for Outpatient Services PDF Print E-mail
Written by Karen Long   
Article Index
OIG Semiannual Report Notes Potential Overpayments for Outpatient Services
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
All Pages

k-long

alert-powered-by-decision-health

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provider errors, unallowable services and insufficient documentation caused Medicare to overpay for outpatient services, according to the Office of Inspector General’s Semiannual Report for April through September.

 

OIG recommended that contractors implement “system edits to identify line item payments that exceed billed charges” and to use audit results it notes in the report. The reports include six jurisdictions.

 

· Palmetto GBA (Jurisdiction 1) – Almost 70 percent of the 1,323 selected line items for outpatient services were incorrect and included overpayments of about $7.5 million that had not been returned, OIG stated.

· Noridian Administrative Services (Jurisdiction 2) – Almost 70 percent of the 1,340 selected line items for outpatient services were incorrect and included overpayments of about $6.2 million that had not been returned, OIG stated.

· Noridian Administrative Services (Jurisdiction 3) – Almost 85 percent of the 1,913 selected line items for outpatient services were incorrect and included overpayments of about $5.8 million that had not been returned, OIG stated.

· National Government Services (Jurisdiction 8) – About 68 percent of the 1,407 selected line items for outpatient services were incorrect and included overpayments of about $7 million that had not been returned, OIG stated.

· First Coast Service Options (Jurisdiction 9) – Almost 78 percent of the 326 selected line items for outpatient services were incorrect and included overpayments of about $1.7 million that had not been returned, OIG stated.

· Highmark Medicare Services (Jurisdiction 12) – Almost 57 percent of the 739 selected line items for outpatient services were incorrect and included overpayments of about $532,000 that had not been returned, OIG stated.


For more on the Semiannual Report, visit
http://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/archives/semiannual/2011/fall/HHS-OIG-SAR-Fall2011.pdf.

 

3 RACs Post New Issues

 

Region A, B and D recovery auditors posted issues recently. See below for more information.

 

Inpatient hospital

 

 

Name of issue

Date posted or approved

Regions/states where it is active

Description of issue

Document sources

Medical necessity review – MS-DRG 483, major joint-limb reattachment procedures of upper extremity with CC/MCC

11/22/11

Conn., Del., D.C., Maine, Mass., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Pa., R.I., Vt.

Medicare pays for inpatient hospital services that are medically necessary for the setting billed. Medical documentation will be reviewed to determine that services were medically necessary.

Sect. 1886(d) of the Social Security Act; CMS Pub. 100-08 chapters 6, 13; CMS Pub. 100-02 chapter 1; CMS Pub. 100-04 chapter 3; Highmark LCD L27548; Medicare inpatient fact sheet; Pepper report; OIG reports A-01-10-0100, OAI-09-88-00880, A-03-00-00007, OAI-05-88-00730

Medical necessity review – MS-DRG 607, minor skin disorders without MCC

11/22/11

Conn., Del., D.C., Maine, Mass., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Pa., R.I., Vt.

Medicare pays for inpatient hospital services that are medically necessary for the setting billed. Medical documentation will be reviewed to determine that services were medically necessary.

Sect. 1886(d) of the Social Security Act; CMS Pub. 100-08 chapters 6, 13; CMS Pub. 100-02 chapter 1; CMS Pub. 100-04 chapter 3; Highmark LCD L27548; Medicare inpatient fact sheet; Pepper report; OIG reports A-01-10-0100, OAI-09-88-00880, A-03-00-00007, OAI-05-88-00730

Medical necessity review – MS-DRG 337, peritoneal adhesiolysis without CC/MCC

11/22/11

Conn., Del., D.C., Maine, Mass., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Pa., R.I., Vt.

Medicare pays for inpatient hospital services that are medically necessary for the setting billed. Medical documentation will be reviewed to determine that services were medically necessary.

Sect. 1886(d) of the Social Security Act; CMS Pub. 100-08 chapters 6, 13; CMS Pub. 100-02 chapter 1; CMS Pub. 100-04 chapter 3; Highmark LCD L27548; Medicare inpatient fact sheet; Pepper report; OIG reports A-01-10-0100, OAI-09-88-00880, A-03-00-00007, OAI-05-88-00730



 

Connect with RACmonitor

Your are currently browsing this site with Internet Explorer 6 (IE6).

Your current web browser must be updated to version 7 of Internet Explorer (IE7) to take advantage of all of template's capabilities.

Why should I upgrade to Internet Explorer 7? Microsoft has redesigned Internet Explorer from the ground up, with better security, new capabilities, and a whole new interface. Many changes resulted from the feedback of millions of users who tested prerelease versions of the new browser. The most compelling reason to upgrade is the improved security. The Internet of today is not the Internet of five years ago. There are dangers that simply didn't exist back in 2001, when Internet Explorer 6 was released to the world. Internet Explorer 7 makes surfing the web fundamentally safer by offering greater protection against viruses, spyware, and other online risks.

Get free downloads for Internet Explorer 7, including recommended updates as they become available. To download Internet Explorer 7 in the language of your choice, please visit the Internet Explorer 7 worldwide page.