California Law Has Special Inpatient Discharge Policies for Homeless Patients

By
Original story posted on: October 31, 2018

  • Product Headline: RACmonitor Compliance Webcasts Subscription
  • Product Image: Product Image
  • Product Description:

    Compliance Education for Every Department at Your Facility

A new California law could have national implications.

The California State Legislature recently passed, and Governor Jerry Brown signed into law, SB 1152, mandating that hospitals create special inpatient discharge planning policies and procedures for their homeless patients, to include mandated interventions specific to the homeless.

Will SB 1152 have national implications? Probably – and for the better. The homeless are a population management challenge as great as reducing readmissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or congestive heart failure (CHF), but without the funding.

Largely, the law’s demands are met if a hospital carefully adheres to the Medicare Conditions of Participation for inpatient discharge planning. The available legislative guidance closely follows the conditions of participation (CoP), but with additional population requirements.

A quick summary of the law’s unique demands: connecting the homeless person with primary care, if insured; or if not enrolled, working to get the person on MediCal. If ineligible, hospitals must direct them to providers such as a county clinics that will provide primary care, as well as connect the person to mental health providers. Hospitals also must provide or assist in obtaining of a supply of prescribed medications, provide transportation to where the person identifies as “home,” up to 30 miles (though this is often nowhere near far enough), and connect or refer the person to social services and a shelter. If the person is from outside the county, permission to refer must be obtained from service organizations. As to local shelters, the hospital must make efforts to verify ability to accept the person.

Regulatory guidance appears more liberal if another county is where the person already receives services, or when no services exist locally. Hospitals must assist by whatever means possible in making social services connections. And finally, a meal and weather-appropriate clothing must be provided. The state insists that the law has no intent to prolong hospitalization, a.k.a. unreimbursed care. A log must be kept of all homeless person discharges to assist in enforcement.

Initial responses from many, including yours truly, is that the homeless crisis is being dumped in the laps of hospitals. Healthcare organizations need something with which to work. There are so few community resources, public or private. Proponents of the law say hospitals brought this on themselves. This has merit. Patients have been dumped on the streets, far from where they call home, hungry and without adequate clothing. The costs will be huge. Yet the law provides no funding, relying on a fiction that hospitals have abundant benevolence funds and excess cash from revenues.

There are resources. Many of the homeless have incomes. In California, a Medicaid expansions state, many are insured. Most do have families or friends who are interested to varying degrees. Adult protective services can help the mentally ill get an LPS conservatorship. There are government-run clinics, or Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). Varying by county, government-run mental health services are available; sometimes the person is already connected. In my home state of Arizona (another Medicaid expansion state), primary and mental health were seldom a concern – a feature of NIMBY (not in my back yard) – since fewer destitute people wander the streets.

Leverage everything at the patient’s disposal. Form regional alliances, sharing available resource information, and form regional plans of action, doing all that is possible with what’s available, and that should be good enough.

Doing nothing is no option at all.

 

Comment on this article

Marvin D Mitchell, RN, BSN, MBA

Marvin D. Mitchell, RN, BSN, MBA, is the director of case management and social work at San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, east of Los Angeles. Building programs from the ground up has been his passion in every venue where case management is practiced. Mitchell is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and makes frequent appearances on Monitor Mondays.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Related Articles

  • Opinion: Too Much Money, Too Little ROI in Today’s Healthcare
    The search for a solution might begin with CMS. We have a problem in America. We spend way too much money on healthcare, and the outcomes we do get are not great. I am pretty darn tired of hearing about…
  • How Well Are Statutory Documentation Requirements Decreasing CMS Program Risks?
    CMS cited by GAO for insufficient documentation. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report on March 27 stating that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) should assess documentation necessary to identify improper payments. The study was performed…
  • Philip Esformes – Fraud, Miami Style
    Major takedown by DOJ sends shivers through skilled nursing facilities. Philip Esformes, the operator of 16 skilled nursing and assisted living facilities in South Florida, was found guilty Friday of 20 charges, including paying bribes and kickbacks to bring Medicare…