Federal judge tosses CMS final rule cutting Medicare payments for hospital clinic services

Original story posted on: September 18, 2019

The ruling marks a stinging rebuke of HHS efforts to steer some services from the hospital outpatient setting to physicians.

A federal judge has ruled that a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) final rule slashing Medicare payments for certain hospital outpatient clinical evaluation and management (E&M) services to the tune of more than $1 billion over just two years never should have been enacted. 

In the matter of American Hospital Association (AHA) v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Director Alex M. Azar II, U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on Tuesday granted the AHA’s motion to vacate the final rule, denied a cross-motion filed by CMS, and remanded the matter for consideration of future remedies.

“CMS believes it is paying millions of taxpayer dollars for patient services in hospital outpatient departments that could be provided at less expense in physician offices,” Collyer wrote in the conclusion of her 28-page decision. “CMS may be correct. But CMS was not authorized to ignore the statutory process for setting payment rates in the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and to lower payments only for certain services performed by certain providers.”

The two parties are now required to submit a joint status report to the Court within two weeks to “determine if additional briefing on remedies is required, along with the CMS estimate as to the duration of further proceedings.”

Specifically, Collyer noted that the CMS rule, which took effect at the start of the calendar year, didn’t qualify as an approved “method” for controlling spikes in hospital usage.

“That context (the applicable governing statutory language) does not make clear what a ‘method’ is, but it does make clear what a ‘method’ is not: it is not a price-setting tool, and the government’s effort to wield it in such a manner is manifestly inconsistent with the statutory scheme,” she wrote. “CMS cannot shoehorn a ‘method’ into the multi-faceted congressional payment scheme when Congress’s clear directions lack any such reference.”

The ruling was interpreted as a striking and clear-cut victory for providers; Modern Healthcare noted that AHA had projected cuts of about $380 million this year and $760 million in 2020 as a direct result of the final rule.

While the ruling did not order CMS to repay hospitals what had been withheld to this point, as the plaintiffs had requested, the scope of the remedy to come is anticipated to be substantial in scope.

Mark Spivey

Mark Spivey is a national correspondent for RACmonitor.com, ICD10monitor.com, and Auditor Monitor who has been writing and editing material about the federal oversight of American healthcare for more than a decade. He can be reached at mcspivey@hotmail.com.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Related Articles

  • Medicare Prior Authorization Program – Ten Things to Know
    Today is the first day that prior authorization is required for Medicare beneficiaries to undergo specific surgeries. Here are the 10 things you need to know about the program. Five types of surgery – blepharoplasty, botulinum toxin injections to the…
  • PHE is an Enigma for Many Providers
    As of now, the public health emergency (PHE) for the COVID-19 pandemic will expire July 24, 2020, unless it is renewed. Fellow contributor David Glaser and I have both reported on the potential end date of the PHE. Recent intel…
  • Prior Authorization for Medicare Two Weeks Away
    It is the hospital’s responsibility to obtain the prior authorization.  We are two weeks away from the start of the Medicare prior authorization program, and as of June 17, the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) were required to start accepting requests.…