Hospital with 0.7% Error Rate Hit with $1.88 Million False Claim Act Settlement

By
Original story posted on: April 4, 2018

If this hospital was targeted by the DOJ, where does that leave everyone else?

Today I have a great mystery to present. Last week the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a $1.88 million False Claims Act settlement with Genesis Medical Center in Davenport, Iowa. In the settlement, the DOJ noted that Genesis “retained Medicare overpayments for inpatient admissions which should have been billed at a lower rate as outpatient or observation services for the period between 2013 and 2016.”

We all know False Claims Act settlements are not uncommon; in fact, on Friday the DOJ announced a $3.2 million settlement with an orthopedic and anesthesia group that was alleged to have conspired to perform surgeries at a surgery center instead of the physician’s office and an $11.5 million settlement with a radiation therapy company which is accused of paying illegal inducements to drive volume.

But what makes the Genesis case stand out is that unlike the other two false claims cases, this case was not initiated by a whistleblower. In fact, there was no indication of what initiated the DOJ investigation, and a spokesperson for the US attorney’s office specifically noted that it was not a whistleblower who initiated the case.

So why did the DOJ go after Genesis Medical Center? My next stop was Google, where I noted another settlement for Genesis for over $53 million, but quickly realized this was a different Genesis; that Genesis was a company that owns and operates nursing facilities and it is clear that they were under investigation for doing a lot of non-compliant things, to have to pay a $53 million settlement.

Then I noted that Genesis Medical Center was in fact audited by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) in 2014 for services provided in 2010 and 2011. Now I was onto something. Genesis must have done really poorly on this audit, so naturally the OIG opened a False Claims Act case.

Well, lo and behold, Genesis did have its inpatient admissions audited. In fact, the OIG must have been concerned, because they audited 283 charts. And how many were determined to be billed improperly? Two. Yes—two out of 283 were improper. In fact, Genesis did well in almost every area audited and they even admitted guilt with every error the OIG found.

So it remains a great mystery as to why Genesis Medical Center was investigated when there was no whistleblower and a recent audit’s results were much, much better than most hospitals’. And it worries me. This 300-bed hospital had an error rate well under 1 percent, and when I look back at other OIG audits of inpatient admissions, I found much larger hospitals with inpatient admission error rates from 25 percent to almost 50 percent.

Until we figure this out, every hospital should ensure its processes to determine patient status are compliant and followed to the letter, because we have no idea how they are picking their targets and who is going to be next.

Program Note

 Listen to Dr. Hirsch on Monitor Monday, every Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST

 

Comment on this article

Ronald Hirsch, MD

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM-PHYADV, CHRI, FABQAURP is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays.

The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Related Articles

  • Coronavirus Hammer Falling Hard on NYC Metro
    The nation’s largest city saw its cases soar past the 1,000 mark this week. I wish that I was writing under better circumstances, but these are difficult times in New York, and across the United States. As of Tuesday, New…
  • Determining When Copay Waivers Are Allowed
    More education is needed to explain when waivers are allowed. The age-old question of “can we offer cash-pay discounts, professional courtesy, and/or the waiver of co-payments or deductibles?” continues to be as relevant today as it was two decades ago.…
  • The One Purpose Test for Healthcare
    Law professor Dershowitz tests the “one purpose test.” During the recent impeachment trial of President Trump, Alan Dershowitz made a statement that was widely interpreted as saying that if a politician had multiple motives for a particular activity, but one…