New Study Raises Concerns over Ineffective Accounting for Social Risk Factors by Medicare Hospital Compare

By
Original story posted on: January 15, 2020

  • Product Headline: RACmonitor Resource
  • Product Image: Product Image
  • Product Description:

    The Social Determinants of Health: Case Management's Next Frontier

Monitor Monday's listeners polled for proposed solutions.

2020 began as it ended, with the healthcare industry fixation on every nook and cranny of the social determinants of health (SDoH). Many experts are still reeling from allegations of inherent bias in algorithms used across the nation. And a new study involving Medicare Hospital Compare is adding fuel to the bias fire.

The study, published in Medical Care, through the American Public Health Association, linked 2017 Medicare Hospital Compare ratings with block group data from the 2015 American Community Survey, which assesses hospital ratings as a function of neighborhood social risk factors. The goal of the study was to examine the relationship between the ratings and neighborhood social risks, but it revealed a larger industry challenge:

Study details:

  • Number = 3,608 Medicare-certified hospitals across 50 states
  • Measures included hospital summary scores and seven quality group scores (using a 100-percentile scale):
    • Effectiveness of care
    • Efficiency of care
    • Hospital readmissions
    • Mortality
    • Patient experience
    • Safety of care, and timeliness of care.
  • Lower hospital summary scores were associated with caring for neighborhoods with higher social risk, including a reduction in hospital scores for every 10 percent of residents who:
    • Are dually eligible for Medicare/Medicaid
    • Have no high-school diploma
    • Are unemployed
    • Self-identified as black
    • Reported high travel times to work

The associations between neighborhood social risk factors and hospital ratings were the smallest in the areas of safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of care groups. The areas with the largest associations were:

  • Timeliness of care
  • Patient experience
  • Hospital readmissions

Could this be another situation of totally unintentional bias in a rating system? Just as safety-net hospitals are righting themselves after the inequity of initial readmission payment penalties, are they now poised for another financial hit? Medicare could be underpaying hospitals that serve communities most at risk for the social determinants, simply because of a skewed rating system; these are the hospitals that need the dollars the most. The outcomes gathered are only as good as the tools developed, and those tools must reflect appropriate measures and context. As an article about the study states, “failing to account for neighborhood social risk in hospital ratings may reinforce hidden disincentives to care for medically underserved areas in the United States.”

We asked our Monitor Mondays listeners in the first survey of 2020 about their choice of a mitigation plan for Medicare Hospital Compare. Here are the results:

How should Medicare Hospital Compare reconcile the issue of accounting for Neighborhood Social Risk?
  • Pull together industry stakeholders to develop SDoH specific recommendations
    27.55%
  • Obtain data on how much reimbursement was lost across hospitals and health systems
    27.55%
  • Revamp the Medicare Hospital Compare rating system
    36.73%
  • Scrap Medicare Hospital Compare: I never liked it anyway!
    8.16%

Programming Note:  Listen to Ellen Fink-Samnick’s live reporting on the State of the Union of SDoH on Monitor Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Ellen Fink-Samnick MSW, ACSW, LCSW, CCM, CRP

Ellen Fink-Samnick is an award-winning healthcare industry expert. She is the esteemed author of books, articles, white papers, and knowledge products. A subject matter expert on the Social Determinants of Health, her latest books, The Essential Guide to Interprofessional Ethics for Healthcare Case Management and Social Determinants of Health: Case Management’s Next Frontier (with foreword by Dr. Ronald Hirsch), are published through HCPro. She is a panelist on Monitor Mondays, frequent contributor to Talk Ten Tuesdays, and member of the RACmonitor Editorial Board.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Related Articles

  • Avalanche of New Guidance from CMS No Match for COVID-19
    Providers and federal officials alike continue to adjust to the new normal, and an uncertain future. EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Ronald Hirsch, vice president of R1 RCM, and healthcare attorney David Glaser, of Fredrikson and Bryon, reported these two stories during…
  • Coronavirus Hammer Falling Hard on NYC Metro
    The nation’s largest city saw its cases soar past the 1,000 mark this week. I wish that I was writing under better circumstances, but these are difficult times in New York, and across the United States. As of Tuesday, New…
  • SdoH: Hospitals Grappling to Integrate Key Assessments
    List of factors for front-line professionals to consider keeps evolving.  Everyone wants to know how to assess the social determinants of health (SDoH). The healthcare industry is working hard to integrate in the moment, creating assessments using the five main…